An example of analysing research for face validity by Hardesty and Bearden (2004) can be found here.Ĭoncurrent validity-This compares the results from a new measurement technique to those of a more established technique that claims to measure the same variable to see if they are related. For example, a method where a participant is required to click a button as soon as a stimulus appears and this time is measured appears to have face validity for measuring reaction time. ![]() Each type views validity from a different perspective and evaluates different relationships between measurements.įace validity-This refers to whether a technique looks as if it should measure the variable it intends to measure. There are 4 main types of validity used when assessing internal validity. ![]() However, here I will focus on the validity of the measurement technique (i.e. Both are very important in analysing the appropriateness, meaningfulness and usefulness of a research study. ![]() Internal validity refers to the validity of the measurement and test itself, whereas external validity refers to the ability to generalise the findings to the target population. ![]() There are two main types of validity, internal and external. Validity is described as the degree to which a research study measures what it intends to measure.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |